Texts: The Ideas of Particle Physics by Coughlan & Dodd (2nd edition) Note: we will typically be covering 3 chapters per lecture, which is typically about 10-15 pages. PDG= Particle Data Booklet class 1: Read Part 0: pp.1-35 HW: 1) What is wrong with Fig. 3.1 p.17? 2) Practice your special relativity: old exam #11 class 2: Read thru (including): Ch. 6 (p. 49) If you look in Griffiths E&M p.462 Eq.11.70 (Larmor formula), you find the formula for the total light power radiated from a (non-relativistic [NR]) accelerating charge...Most folks would write this result as: P = (2/3) (q^2/4\pi\epsilon_0) (a^2/c^3) Consider what happens when a light wave goes by a free, initially stationary electron. The light's E field will cause the electron to accelerate which will then produce new light at the above rate. (Note: light's B field will produce a force --and hence an acceleration-- on a moving electron; in the NR limit this effect is small.) We are free to consider this new light as scattered light from the initial wave. (Certainly conservation of energy assures us that the incoming light must be diminished by this process.) The light wave has an average intensity (Watts/m^2) given by: I= (1/2) c\epsilon_0 E_0^2 (Griffiths, p.381, Eq. 9.63) where E_0 is the light's electric field amplitude. The scattered light power is equivalent to the light wave's power falling on a small area (which is called the Thomson cross section of the electron). Calculate the average radiated power due to wave caused acceleration Calculate the Thomson cross section Draw a Feynman diagram that corresponds to this process Note that E_0 should cancel out of this result. You can find the correct result in the Physical Constants table of PDB, but my favorite way to write the result is: \sigma_T = (8\pi/3) \alpha^2 \lambda_e^2 where \alpha is the fine structure constant and \lambda_e is the electron's Compton wavelength class 3: old exam #1 Consider the weak gauge bosons: W and Z. Look up (and record) the mass and width of these particles both our the textbook's Appendix 5 and in PDB. A) Calculate the lifetime of the W from from its width. Assuming the W is moving at c (but neglecting any time dilation effect), what is the range of the W before it decays? B) Assume the that data for the W in Appendix 5 results from sampling of a normal distribution, with standard deviation given by the width and SDOM given by the reported error in the mass. How many Ws had been detected by 1991 (publication date of book)? Make the same assumptions for the data in the 2004 PDB. How many Ws had been detected by 2004? In the hall between our classroom and the Jacobs Ladder find the "Chart of Fundamental Particles" (from 1969!). Find an report a discrepancy between this chart and what we currently believe. class 4: old exam #13 (note the density of Carbon can be found in the PDB) The SU(3) matrices may also be found here: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2005/reviews/su3rpp.pdf where: G=(1/2) \lambda see Table 9.1 and Eq. 9.7 in handout (the structure constants fabc) Confirm Eq. 9.7 for the last two entries in Table 9.1: f458 and f678 see Eq. 9.8... Show that Uħ works as expected for a raising/lowering operator of T3 and Y class 5: old exam #3,14,15 class 6: Note: discussion of CP violation in PDG consider the three state system via mathematica Let the Hamiltonian be the real symmetric matrix: h={{0,.01,0},{.01,1,.1},{0,.1,10}} {{e1,e2,e3},{v1,v2,v3}}=Eigensystem[m] Notice that the eigenvectors are real and orthonormal Since they are real we can avoid some Conjugate[] Explain why the following code plots the probability of finding the particle in the {1,0,0} state at a time t, given that it started in the {1,0,0} state. a1=v1.{1,0,0} a2=v2.{1,0,0} a3=v3.{1,0,0} psi[t_]=a1 v1 Exp[-I e1 t] + a2 v2 Exp[-I e2 t] + a3 v3 Exp[-I e3 t] Plot[Conjugate[psi[t].{1,0,0}] psi[t].{1,0,0},{t,0,1}] Notice that with this h, the oscilation has a small amplitude. Find an h that produces big amplitude oscillations and display a Plot of those oscillations. class 7: Note: according to the syllabus we have Midterm Exam just before Thanksgiving: Monday 21-Nov what's wrong with Fig 18.2 p.86? class 8: Recall that the SU(3) lambda matrices may be found here: http://pdg.lbl.gov/2005/reviews/su3rpp.pdf They are closely related to the G matrices from the handout. G=(1/2) lambda For any one of the lambda find a reduced expression for: U=Exp[ I x lambda ] Show that the result is unitary for any x. Calculate: I U D[U^-1,x]...is the result the expected hermitian matrix? class 9: READ: http://hepwww.ph.qmw.ac.uk/epp/higgs.html In 1993, the then UK Science Minister, William Waldegrave, issued a challence to physicists to answer the questions 'What is the Higgs boson, and why do we want to find it?' on one side of a single sheet of paper. Which one do you think is the best and why class 10: happy thanksgiving class 11: Consider the (unnormalized) "Yukawa" charge density: rho[r_] = Exp[- m r]/r Find the corresponding form factor (i.e., find the Fourier transform of rho). Note that one could normalize this charge density and then automatically get F normalized to F(0)=1, however it's easier just to use the unnormalized rho and then find the multiplicative constant that results in F(0)=1. Note that: -D[rho[r],r]=Exp[- m r] so you can differentiate your results to find the form factor for the exponential rho. This should match the experimental result described in class.